Strong Opinions, Weakly Held: Lessons from Mark Zuckerberg & Steve Jobs

I’ve often seen the phrase “strong opinions, weakly held” used to indicate both a focused approach to achieving an outcome but also flexibility in the face of new data. This is an important characteristic of some of the most successful leaders in tech and I thought it was about time I fleshed out this philosophy in more detail as it applies to product management.

Weak Opinions, Strongly Held

The first question is what’s the difference between a strong opinion versus a weak one in product management? A strong opinion is one where there is a clear point of view and the product team goes all in on that point of view. Apple going touch based with the iPhone when every other device had a keyboard is such an example. A weak opinion is when a product decision is a tentative half measure because the team either lacks the clarity or commitment to go all the way. Microsoft’s Windows 8 which was neither a good desktop OS nor a good tablet OS while trying to be both is an example of a weak opinion.

The difference between strongly held versus weakly held opinions should be clear. When a product team decides to ignore user feedback, market research or the competitive landscape and keeps soldering on in a clearly bad direction, that’s an example of being bitten by a strongly held opinion. My favorite recent example is Snapchat rolling out their redesign to negative initial feedback from internal & external voices but then rolling that redesign to everyone and losing millions of users.

Steve Jobs

There are multiple famous examples of Steve Jobs making a strong statement about what features Apple devices would support then reversing direction by elegantly integrating such functionality in Apple products. Steve Jobs famously saying nobody reads anymore in 2008 then rolling out iBooks in 2010 and saying there’d be no video on iPod because Apple was focused on music in 2004 only to ship video on their portable devices are great examples of saying no until it was time to say yes.

However my favorite example is Steve Jobs going from not wanting 3rd party developers to sully his awesome iPhone experience to creating the App Store and revolutionizing software discovery, acquisition & monetization across the entire industry. This quote from the revolution Steve Jobs resisted captures the moment well

That ended up being millions of apps not hundreds.

Mark Zuckerberg

The best way to sum up Facebook is that the only constant is change. As with Apple, there are many examples of Facebook going strongly in a particular direction then pivoting as trends begin to change. The most popular story being the tale of how Facebook went from a popular desktop site which treated mobile as an afterthought to being the world’s most popular mobile app. Key excerpts from Mashable’s article on the turnaround include

A similar pivot can be observed in Facebook’s approach to sharing. For a long time Facebook was focused on its users sharing as much as possible with as many people as possible but over time has changed that position slowly first by rethinking some default permissions and earlier this year started to prioritize posts from your friends over news sites.

However the direction implied from their most recent earnings call is the biggest indication of how far Facebook has swung. During that call we learn from CEO Mark Zuckerberg that

This is a markedly different direction from what we’ve come to expect from Facebook and it’s clear they are going in this direction full force. A strong opinion, weakly held.

Now Playing: Kap G — Marvelous Day

"Everything you touch you change. Everything you change, changes you" - Octavia Butler, Parable of the Sower